Legal Opinion
Vyskocil v. Vyskocil
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided August 8, 1978PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
This case raises issues of appellate procedure related to those discussed in Maurice Callahan & Sons v. Outdoor Advertising Bd., ante 135 (1978). The plaintiff a Colorado resident, brought an action in tlie Probate Court for contempt, alleging that her former hus band, now a Massachusetts resident, had failed to comply with a Minnesota divorce judgment. After thorough evidentiary hearings, the judge held that the defendant was not in contempt, and the plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal on December 8, 1976. The forty-day period prescribed by Rule 9 (c) of the Massachusetts Rules of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Superintendent of Worcester State Hospital v. HagbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Gilmore v. GilmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brown v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Mailer v. MailerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Georgantis v. Star Market CompaniesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Cape Cod Bank & Trust Co. v. LeTendreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Kunkel v. AlgerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.