Legal Opinion

Smart v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2010No. S-13438PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. - INTRODUCTION

The State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) is authorized by regulation to use "statistically valid sampling methodologies" to calculate overpayments made to providers of Medicaid services who are subject to audit. DHSS created a protocol that details its auditing methodology, and an independent auditor used this protocol in the audit of Medicaid provider Keirsten Smart. At the conclusion of the audit process, DHSS sought to recoup overpayments made to Smart. Smart did not appeal the final audit results or recoupment decision to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Eidelson v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kyle S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Friends of Willow Lake, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, Division of Aviation & AirportsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API