Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of Detroit

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 30, 1994No. 79-73934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING INTERVENORS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On October 12, 1993, the Sixth Circuit reversed this Court’s decision denying Commodities Export Company and Walter H. Lubienski’s motion to intervene in this condemnation action, holding that Commodities and Lubienski were entitled to intervention as a matter of right. In so doing, the appellate court made no determination and no findings with respect to Commodities and Lubienski’s proposed motion for preliminary injunction, 1 and instead ordered that the case be remanded to this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  3. United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API