United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of Detroit
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DISMISSAL (IN CASE NO. 79-73931), AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION (IN CASE NO. 96-75195) TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND VACATE DECLARATION OF TAKING
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is presently before the Court on four dispositive Motions:
1) Commodities Export Company and Walter H. Lubienski’s “Motion for Summary Judgment and for Permanent Injunction or Alternately for Preliminary Injunction”;
2) the Government’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment;
3) DIBC’s [the Detroit International Bridge Company’s] Cross-Motion for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001