Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of Detroit

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 24, 1999No. 79-CV-73934-DT, 96-CV-75495-DTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DISMISSAL (IN CASE NO. 79-73931), AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION (IN CASE NO. 96-75195) TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND VACATE DECLARATION OF TAKING

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is presently before the Court on four dispositive Motions:

1) Commodities Export Company and Walter H. Lubienski’s “Motion for Summary Judgment and for Permanent Injunction or Alternately for Preliminary Injunction”;

2) the Government’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment;

3) DIBC’s [the Detroit International Bridge Company’s] Cross-Motion for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API