Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of Detroit

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 13, 2001No. 79-CV-73934-DT, 96-CV-75494-DT, 96-CV-75495-DT, 01-CV-70391-DTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LI-MINE TO EXCLUDE VALUATION TESTIMONY

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action presents an unfortunate example of the Government using its eminent domain power to the detriment of one private party for the benefit of another private party. This matter has been pending before this Court since December 1991. 1 In the face of allegations of collu sion between the Government and the ben-efitted party, the Government for years repeatedly represented that it had no intention of putting the burdened party, Defendant Commodities Export Company…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. 25.202 Acres of Land & BuildingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API