United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of Detroit
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LI-MINE TO EXCLUDE VALUATION TESTIMONY
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action presents an unfortunate example of the Government using its eminent domain power to the detriment of one private party for the benefit of another private party. This matter has been pending before this Court since December 1991. 1 In the face of allegations of collu sion between the Government and the ben-efitted party, the Government for years repeatedly represented that it had no intention of putting the burdened party, Defendant Commodities Export Company…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. 25.202 Acres of Land & BuildingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010