Legal Opinion
Kirschner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Incorporated Village of Valley Stream
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 16, 1995No. CV 93-1764 (ADS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge:
The defendants’ have submitted an application for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, in accordance with an order of the Court dated October 22, 1994. In that order the Court granted the defendants’ motion for sanctions against the plaintiffs’ attorneys under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violation of their Due Process and Equal Protection rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and of their free…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Estate of Perlbinder v. Dubrowsky (In Re Dubrowsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Mendoza v. City of RomeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Zlotnick v. HubbardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.