Legal Opinion
Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 2, 1995No. CV 90-3006 (ADS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER RE: ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
SPATT, District Judge:
On July 11, 1995, the Court issued a decision in this case finding that the defendants Intermedies Orthopedics, Inc. (“Intermedies” or “IOI”) and Marli Medical Supplies, Inc. (“Marli”) literally and willfully infringed claims 8, 10 and 12 of United States Patent No. 4,888,023 (“the 023 patent”) by designing, marketing and selling a femoral prosthesis known as the APR II and its successor the APR II-T (the APR II and APR II-T shall be referred to as the “APR II”). In addition, the Court determined that the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Houston v. CotterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Foster v. Kings Park Central School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Fluke Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.