Legal Opinion

Garrido v. Team Auto Sales, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2018No. 28390PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJensen, Justice

[¶1.] Alejandro Garrido and Tanya Hoof purchased a used vehicle from Team Auto Sales, Inc. (TAS), a used-car dealer. In this action, Garrido, Hoof, and Hoof's six-year old son, M.I., (Appellants) allege that the vehicle was sold without a muffler and that they suffered carbon monoxide poisoning from the vehicle. The circuit court determined that Appellants failed to generate a question of fact as to causation and granted TAS's motion for summary judgment on all claims. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Background

[¶2.] Hoof and Garrido were involved in a romantic relationship and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Wright v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Luther v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Robinson-Podoll v. Harmelink, Fox, & Ravnsborg Law OfficeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Primrose Retirement Communities, LLC and Gillette Retirement, LLC v. Ghidorzi Construction Company, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Matter of Drainage Permit of McAreaveySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API