Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 4, 1988No. 1 CA-CR 11000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

Allen Miller was indicted on one count of theft in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1802. Pri- or to trial, his motion to dismiss the prosecution for lack of jurisdiction was granted. The state appealed pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4032(1). We affirm the dismissal.

Jerry Farmer and Julie Hart stole eleven diamond rings from a J.C. Penney store in Flagstaff, Arizona. They traveled to Du-rango, Colorado, with the rings in their possession. In Durango, Farmer and Hart met Allen Miller, the defendant in this case. Farmer and Hart did not know Miller prior to their meeting in Durango.

F…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Skiriotes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. McNairArizona Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WilloughbyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Keselica v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  5. State v. YeganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API