Legal Opinion
State v. Yegan
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 8, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 08-0455PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Judge.
¶ 1 Sama Yegan appeals from his convictions and sentences on four counts of luring a minor for sexual exploitation. He asserts that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the conduct for which he was charged occurred in California. He also contends that the court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. For the following reasons, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 Yegan met “Erica” during an online chat session on April 27, 2005. He initiated contact with her from his home in California. The chat room was in the “Arizona” section of the web site and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. LandriganArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lay v. Nelson In And For County Of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. BhattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Lay v. Hon. nelson/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014