Strassheim v. Daily
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COllftT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. The facts are stated in the oninion. .
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is an appeal ffom an order on habeas corpus discharging the respondent, Daily, from custody under a warrant of the Governor of- Illinois directing his extradition to Michigan as a fugitive from justice from that State. Daily, it appears, had been indicted in Michigan for bribery and also for obtaining money from the State by false pretenses, and a requisition had been issued to which the warrant of the Governor of Illinois was the response. The District Judge who issued the habeas corpus was of opinion, however, that the facts alleged in the indictment for obtaining money by false…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3Cited by313 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.