Keselica v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
DUFF, Senior Judge.
Michael George Keselica appeals his conviction for embezzlement. He contends that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to try the case. We disagree and affirm.
I
“On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 443, 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987).
So. viewed, the evidence showed that Robert A. Winstead resided in Fairfax County until December 4, 1993. In 1989, appellant was Winstead’s “financial adviser, telling [him] which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Travelers Health Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Moreno v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Ray Dayton Dove, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- PSINet, Inc. v. ChapmanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
- State v. Elizabeth DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- United States v. DoveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001