Legal Opinion

State v. Flores

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 31, 2008No. 1 CA-CR 07-0800 PRPCPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Andres Coz Flores (“Flores”) seeks review of the trial court’s order summarily dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. The question of subject matter jurisdiction presented by this ease is one of first impression. We must decide whether Arizona has jurisdiction over the crime of solicitation to commit human smuggling when the offense is committed by a Mexican citizen, Flores, in Mexico, but the result or effect of the crime is Flores’ illegal entry into and subsequent illegal transportation within Arizona. For the reasons set forth in this…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. IMS Health Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. United States v. Wilfredo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API