Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Fey

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1985No. C5-85-773PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Gary Fey appeals from an order and judgment of paternity entered by default. Fey contends that he was denied due process of law because the matter was heard as a default, that there is insufficient evidence to support the judgment of paternity, and that a letter in possession of respondent’s attorney was improperly withheld from the trial court. Respondent moved to strike portions of appellant’s brief and appendix not a part of the record on appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

Linda Thomas commenced action against appellant alleging that Fey had sexual intercourse with her during…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Wessels v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. County of Hennepin ex rel. Bartlow v. BrinkmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dade v. State, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. LovettAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Haile v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Locher v. GareisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. A.P. v. State, Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Public Assistance & Social Services, ex rel. B.L.S.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API