Legal Opinion

County of Hennepin ex rel. Bartlow v. Brinkman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1985No. C3-84-1605PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Dennis Brinkman contends the trial court erred when ordering a default judgment based on his failure to comply with an order for blood tests. We reverse.

FACTS

In November 1983, Dennis Brinkman was served with a verified petition asserting that he was the father of Tammie Lea Bartlow’s child. Brinkman served an answer denying he was a parent of the child. He made a personal appearance with counsel, in January 1984; following his request for blood tests, the court ordered that the parties submit to those tests.

On two scheduled occasions, appellant failed to appear…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hepfel v. BashawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State, on Behalf of Ortloff v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Wessels v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Strong v. ComerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Hennepin Ex Rel. Bartlow v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Thomas v. FeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API