Legal Opinion

Dade v. State, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Lovett

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1986No. S-1194PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

1. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The State Child Support Enforcement Division filed a complaint on behalf of Patricia Lovett against Arnold Dade to adjudicate paternity of her minor child and compel child support payments. Dade answered and denied paternity. The parties stipulated that Lovett, Dade and the child would submit to blood tests, and the court entered an appropriate order.

Lovett discovered that Dade arranged for a friend to submit blood for testing in Dade’s stead. She moved for sanctions, including an order establishing paternity. Superior Court Judge Victor D. Carlson…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GuinnAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ketchikan Cold Storage Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hawes Firearms Co. v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. County of Hennepin Ex Rel. Bartlow v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Lakeview Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hughes v. BobichAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Alaska Trams Corp. v. Alaska Electric Light & PowerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Rubright v. ArnoldAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rubright v. ArnoldAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API