Legal Opinion
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 2, 2013No. Case No.: 5:12-CV-5481 EJDPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
[Re: Docket No. 29]
EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Patrick Dang (“Plaintiff’), an individual, has brought this putative class action against the National Football League (“NFL”), its member clubs, National Football League Properties, Inc. (“NFLP”), and Reebok International, Ltd. (“Reebok”) — collectively “Defendants.” Plaintiff Dang has alleged that Defendants have engaged in anticompetitive behavior and entered into agreements in violation of state and federal antitrust laws. The allegedly unlawful conduct relates to agree*1102ment…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spinelli v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- MULTIPLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. UNDER ARMOUR, INCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- PBTM LLC v. Football Northwest LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Palladino v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Sumotext Corp. -v- Zoove, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.