Legal Opinion
Sumotext Corp. -v- Zoove, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 6, 2020No. 5:16-cv-01370Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SUMOTEXT CORP., Case No. 16-cv-01370-BLF 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 10 v. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 11 ZOOVE, INC; VIRTUAL HOLD [Re: ECF 495] TECHNOLOGY, LLC; VHT STARSTAR 12 LLC; and STARSTEVE, LLC, 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff Sumotext Corporation (“Sumotext”) claims that Defendants Zoove, Inc. 17 (“Zoove”), Virtual Hold Technology, LLC (“VHT”), VHT StarStar LLC (“VHT StarStar”), and 18 StarSteve, LLC (“StarSteve”) violated federal antitrust laws by seeking to exclude it from two 19…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Natural Beverage Distributors, D/B/A Mendocino Coast Distributing Co. Florence M. BeardsleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.