MULTIPLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. UNDER ARMOUR, INC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MULTIPLE ENERGY ) ) TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) 2:20-CV-664-NR Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) UNDER ARMOUR, INC., ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM ORDER J. Nicholas Ranjan, United States District Judge Defendant Under Armour, Inc. moves to dismiss Plaintiff Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC’s second amended complaint in this antitrust case. ECF 64. The Court previously dismissed MET’s antitrust claim based on its failure to allege that it was a “direct competitor” of Under Armour, as well as its failure to adequately define the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Sharif Pharmacy Inc. v. Prime Therapeutics LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Dang v. San Francisco Forty NinersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.