Legal Opinion
People v. Burcham
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1924No. Crim. No. 812PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of perjury and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The alleged perjury is charged to have been committed during the trial of People v. Mahach and Rube, 60 Cal. App. 635 [213 Pac. 539]. The defendant was convicted of perjury in giving some of the testimony herein alleged to be false, prior to the commencement of this action. The judgment in that case was reversed. (People v. Burcham, 62 Cal. App. 649 [217 Pac. 558].) The opinion therein contains a comprehensive statement of the facts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. DisperatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Clayton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- People v. CasanovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. Di GiacomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. RoubusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.