Legal Opinion
Richland Wholesale Liquors, Inc. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided August 29, 1966No. Civ. A. No. AC-961PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for production under Rule 34 of the following documents in possession and control of the defendant Ben Arnold Company, Inc.:
The financial statements and records of Ben Arnold Company, Inc., including copies of State and Federal Income Tax Returns for the years 1955 through 1965.
The motion recites that “each of the foregoing records and documents * * * constitutes or contains evidence relevant and material to the matter involved * * The matter involved is an action for an injunction and for damages to plaintiff’s business brought about by alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wiesenberger v. W. E. Hutton & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Cooper v. Hallgarten & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Kingsley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Goss v. CrossleyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
- Eastern Auto Distributors, Inc. v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
- Schlatter v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Eglin Federal Credit Union v. Cantor, Fitzgerald Securities Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.