Legal Opinion

Wiesenberger v. W. E. Hutton & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 27, 1964PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYATT, District Judge.

Motion by plaintiff to modify a subpoena and for a protective order. Fed.R. Civ.P. 30(b), 45(b) and 45(d)(1).

The complaint contains one count for claimed violations of a section of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q (a) —“fraudulent interstate transactions”, of a section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j (b) —“manipulative and deceptive devices”; and of two sections of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-3—“registration of investment advisers”—and 15 U.S.C. § 80b-6—“prohib-ited transactions by investment advisers”. Federal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kingsley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. O'Connell v. Olsen & UgelstadtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. DeMasi v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Smith v. BaderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API