Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Hallgarten & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 22, 1964PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiff moves for a protective order pursuant to Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1) limiting any inquiry upon his deposition as to, and (2) excluding production upon his deposition of:(1) his income tax returns and other financial records reflecting his gross income for the years 1958 through 1963:(2) memoranda and other writings of any tax consultant from 1950 through 1963 relating to the “tax advantages or consequences of participation in oil or gas ventures”; and(3) all writings and records of gas or oil ventures in which plaintiff may…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John R. McWeeney v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sager v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Stokes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Weigel v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- DeMasi v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Smith v. BaderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Blount v. Wake Electric Membership Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Stabilus v. Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & GreavesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- LSR Joint Venture No. 2 v. Callewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.