Legal Opinion
Fat v. County of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 2002No. C037610PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, J.
Defendant County of Sacramento (County) approved a negative declaration and conditional use permit allowing real parties in interest Sunset Skyranch Pilots Association and Daniel Lang (collectively the Pilots) to operate and expand Sunset Skyranch Airport (Airport) in Elk Grove. Plaintiffs Kenneth F. Fat and Wing K. Fat (collectively the Fats) filed a petition for writ of mandate to set aside County’s actions on grounds it failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) (CEQA).1 The court granted the petition, and County…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Sundstrom v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Citizens for Open Government v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.