Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of Eureka
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRUINIERS, J. *
In this matter, a school playground has become a neighborhood battleground. This case arises from objections by appellants Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government (Eureka Citizens), 1 James Emery, and Andrew and Ida Nash (collectively, appellants) to use by the Eureka Church of the Nazarene (Church), and its related Redwood Christian School (School) (collectively, applicant), of a portion of its property as a school playground (the Project). Appellants contend that the City of Eureka (City) improperly granted post hoc approval of illegally constructed Project…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- California Oak Foundation v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.