Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1988No. A038922PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

Robert T. Sundstrom (hereafter appellant), appeals from a judgment of the Mendocino County Superior Court denying a petition for writ of mandate to set aside a use permit of Mendocino County (hereafter County) for noncompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Appellant owns a shopping mall in the small unincorporated coastal town of Gualala. Real party in interest, Harold K. Miller (hereafter applicant or Miller), currently operates a small 17-unit motel with a 42-seat restaurant and filling station on the outskirts of town. He plans to build nearby a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Save Tara v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Sierra Club v. County of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API