United States v. Hobbs
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Per curiam
The accused challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for wrongful possession of heroin and he contends that the trial judge’s conduct deprived him of a fair trial. We decide both contentions against him.
On November 27,1975, a German customs inspector, aboard a train that had entered the Federal Republic of Germany from the Netherlands, saw the accused sitting by himself. Accused’s seat was next to a window, in a section of a car described as an “opened carriage” type. The seats of the section were so arranged, that the area could accommodate four persons. As the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Bernard L. FergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. LovellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. AloyianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. SpiveyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. ReynoldsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.