Legal Opinion

United States v. Reynolds

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 28, 1984No. CM 443711PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WALCZAK, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of fraudulent use of a writing in support of a claim against the United States, a violation of Article 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 932 (1982). Appellant was sentenced by a general court-martial composed of officer members to confinement at hard labor for one year and forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for twelve months. The convening authority approved the sentence.

The facts, as developed at trial, show that sometime in April or May 1982, appellant submitted a claim for shipment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. United States v. PayneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Goldsmith v. Superior Court of Hancock CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. United States v. HobbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. HenryUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  3. United States v. DockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. WoodU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. FoleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API