Legal Opinion
Mohawk Utilities, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1974No. 73-577PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The commission, in its opinion and order, concluded that:
“(5) The recent decision of the Ohio Supreme Court in Forest Hills Util. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 46, decided July 12, 1972, is dispositive of the issues in the instant case.
“ (6) Under the holding of the Ohio Supreme Court in the Forest Hills case, respondents so-called ‘available for use’ charge is unreasonable and unlawful.”
Those conclusions of the commission were based upon an erroneous reading of our holding in Forest Hills. There, we were reviewing an order of the commission, wherein it resolved a dispute…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nevada Building Authority v. HancockNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Kitchen v. ChristmanOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Shopping Centers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Forest Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Lakeside Utilities Corp. v. BarnumOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Pledger v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Sparks v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.