Legal Opinion

Bank of Ukiah v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1901No. S.F. No. 1543PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action in foreclosure.

The appellant, John S. Reed, executed to the plaintiff July 23, 1892, his promissory note for fifteen thousand four hundred and ninety-one dollars, and at the same time, to secure its payment, executed a mortgage upon certain real estate in Mendocino county, known as the Reed Ranch. December 5, 1893, he executed to the plaintiff another promissory note for four thousand seven hundred and two dollars, together with a mortgage for securing its payment upon the property described in his former mortgage, and at the same time transferred and assigned to the plaintiff certain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cord v. SouthwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WeilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Elston v. HixMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fullerton Savings Bank v. Des GrangesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API