Legal Opinion

Broder v. Conklin

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1893No. 18104PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Mono County setting aside a judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

— A trial of the issues herein was had in Inyo County before Hon. J. F. Rooney, judge of the superior court of Tuolumne County, who had been directed by the governor to try the cause on account of the disqualification of the superior judge of Inyo County, and on the 26th of September, 1890, the judge filed his findings of fact and conclusions of law, in which he found “ that the plaintiffs herein are entitled to judgment,” and added as a closing direction, “counsel will prepare an interlocutory judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, directing a reference to a commissioner to be appointed by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mace v. O'ReilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Condee v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hastings v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Loeschigk v. AddisonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Cirro Wrecking Co. v. RoppoloIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API