Elston v. Hix
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
This action was instituted to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate situated in Fergus county. After the defendants answered, a stipulation was entered into between the parties under which the answer was withdrawn and plaintiff was authorized to make the necessary proof, secure a judgment, and “have a sale of said property.” The default of the defendants was entered and proof submitted. The decree which followed is in the usual form, except that it directs that the property “be sold together, as the same cannot be sold in separate parcels without material injury to the plaintiff in said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Thomas v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Connick v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Marston v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ontario Land & Improvement Co. v. BedfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte WeilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Gaskill v. NealIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Federal Land Bk. of Spokane v. CurtsIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Clack v. ClackMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SlackMontana Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.