Legal Opinion
Ashbury Truck Co. v. Railroad Commission of California
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 25, 1931No. U-II-HPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLZER, District Judge.
Plaintiff is engaged in business as a common carrier of freight by automotive trucks over certain highways in the state of California, and has instituted this bill in equity to enjoin the enforcement of certain orders of the railroad commission of said state, limiting the commodities plaintiff may transport, and also to enjoin said commission from interfering with plaintiff operating under certain prior orders of the commission, vacated by it, and under which prior orders plaintiff contends it acquired a franchise to transport all classes of freight.
The salient facts,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Los Angeles Switching CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northern California Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Abrey v. ReuschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Southern California Freight Lines v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1284, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2200 United Parcel Service, Inc. v. California Public Utilities Commission Daniel Wm. Fessler Patricia M. EckertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.