Legal Opinion

United Parcel Service, Inc. v. California Public Utilities Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1996No. 94-15079PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), appeals the district court’s summary judgment, dismissing UPS’s 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202 action against the California Public Utilities *1180Commission (“the CPUC” or “the Commission”) on the basis of res judicata, following a California Supreme Court decision summarily denying review of UPS’s claims. UPS contends that a February 3, 1993, rate-setting decision by CPUC violates UPS’s state and federal constitutional rights. UPS further argues that the district court’s res judi-cata ruling deprives it of a forum for its federal claims,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of CapitolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Executive Arts Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1284, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2200 United Parcel Service, Inc. v. California Public Utilities Commission Daniel Wm. Fessler Patricia M. EckertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Los Altos El Granada v. City of CapitolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Spirit Temple v. Cnty. of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API