Legal Opinion
Republic Iron and Steel Co. v. Patillo
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 1912No. Civ. No. 1016PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
This action was brought against defendants as sureties on a bond given for the protection of materialmen and laborers under a contract made by the Patillo Contracting Company with the city of Hollywood for the doing of certain street work. Defendant Patillo made default and defendant Sherer has appealed from a judgment entered against him, and also from an order made denying his motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff in its complaint set out that the Patillo Contracting Company, on .or about the 13th of August, 1909, entered into a contract with the street superintendent of the city of Hollywood, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- San Francisco Lumber Co. v. BibbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- W. W. Montague & Co. v. FurnessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miles v. BaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Concrete Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Zalk-Josephs Company v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Lamb v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Live Oak Lumber Co. v. FarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.