Live Oak Lumber Co. v. Farr
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent for lumber and material furnished to William F. Farr to be used and which was used in the construction of a sewer system for the city of Gridley, a municipal corporation of the sixth class. The action was brought under the provisions of the so-called Bond Act, approved March 27, 1897 (Stats. 1897, p. 201), as amended in 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 1422).
The complaint contains two counts, one for the material furnished by plaintiff and the other on an assigned claim for similar material furnished by the Diamond Match Company. A…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Miles v. BaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Kiessig v. AllspaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. HusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hamilton v. AbadjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Young v. WaldropMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Reifke v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Kirkpatrick v. DouglasMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- National Surety Co. v. W. H. Holliday Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.