Legal Opinion

San Francisco Lumber Co. v. Bibb

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1903No. S.F. No. 3042PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an action on a contractor’s bond. The bond in question, by all its provisions, and in express terms, ran in favor of the owner of the contemplated structure. It provided that the contractor should perform all the terms of a certain building contract, entered into between the owner and himself, with a liability in her favor for damages not exceeding twenty-four hundred dollars, with a further provision, that if he should perform his contract, the obligation of the bond should be discharged.

All these various provisions ran solely in favor of the owner of the building by name.

At the end…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Miles v. BaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ParsonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Merchants Fire Assurance Corp. of New York v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. W. W. Montague & Co. v. FurnessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API