Legal Opinion

State v. Stempf

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 2001No. C4-00-1544PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge

A jury found appellant Jack Stempf guilty of one count of controlled-substance crime in the fifth degree for possession of a substance containing methamphetamine. The state charged him with only one count of possession but introduced evidence of two acts to support the conviction. Appellant contends that the trial court’s refusal to give a specific unanimity instruction, requiring the jurors to agree that the same underlying criminal act had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, violated his right to a unanimous verdict. Because it is possible that the jury’s verdict of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. EstorgaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Ayala-LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. DalbecCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. WentheCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State v. WentheCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API