State v. Wenthe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge*
Appellant argues that the clergy sexual conduct statute violates the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution on its fact. He further argues his conviction of third-degree criminal sexual conduct rests on production of evidence that was excessively entangled with religion, in violation of the Establishment Clause. We affirm the district court’s determination that the statute enunciates secular standards and therefore does not violate the Establishment Clause on its face. But because appellant’s conviction was based on evidence that was excessively entangled in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. NetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. BussmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. WentheCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher PathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015