Legal Opinion

State v. Peele

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 2009No. COA08-713PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Lucian Jefferson Peele, Jr, appeals from his conviction for driving while impaired (“DWI”). Defendant contends primarily that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress on the grounds that the police officer who stopped him lacked the necessary reasonable articulable suspicion. The State responds that an anonymous tip combined with the officer’s own observations were sufficient to supply reasonable suspicion. We have concluded, however, that the State failed to demonstrate either that the tip was reliable or that it was corroborated by the police officer. In…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. OttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. OsterhoudtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. CantyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. DerbyshireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API