Legal Opinion

Karlslyst v. Frazier

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4393PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Appellant, Oscar Karlslyst, brought this action to obtain equitable relief from a provision in an interlocutory decree of divorce entered in an action brought against him by respondent herein, who is now Elsie Frazier, ordering him to contribute $25 a month to the support of Marian Elaine Karlslyst, found by the court to be the child of the parties, until further order of court.

As grounds for relief appellant alleged that said Marian Elaine Karlslyst, born four months after his marriage to respondent, was not his child; that at the time of their separation, which was about a year after…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Black v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Bell v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re Marriage of StevenotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. In Re Marriage of LippelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API