Rothschild v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by Bernard Rothschild and another against the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada. From an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint defendant appeals. For former report, see 10 H. Y. Supp. 36.
1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.
There are three counts set forth in the complaint, the first of which is that, on or about the 27th day of April, 1889, the defendant, for a valuable consideration, agreed with the plaintiffs to carry from Detroit, Mich., to Rochester, N. Y., two trunks, containing goods of the value of $1,000, belonging to the plaintiffs; but that the defendant so negligently carried such property that the same was lost, and not delivered to the plaintiffs. The second count is, in substance, that in violation of the agreement of the foregoing date, under an arrangement to transport the same from Detroit to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Fernandez v. AburreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Ochs v. FreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- John T. Noye Manufacturing Co. v. RaymondThe Superior Court of New York City · 1894
- John T. Noye Manufacturing Co. v. RaymondThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894