Legal Opinion

Ruddock v. Ohls

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1979No. Civ. 4165PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CREEDE, J. * —

Statement of the Case

Respondent Darrel Ohls and his wife, Diane E. Ohls, were divorced in Oregon on September 21, 1971. In its divorce decree, the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, for the County of Linn, action No. 39484, entitled “Darrell L. Ohls, Plaintiff, vs. Diane E. Ohls, Defendant,” made a finding that respondent “is not the father of the minor child, Christina Joanne Ruddock, born March 24; 1969, and support for said child is hereby denied.” Both parties appeared in person with counsel at a trial of the action on June 29, 1971, at which evidence was heard and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rodríguez Avilés v. Rodríguez BeruffSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  4. G.E.B. v. S.R.W.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Hall v. LalliArizona Supreme Court · 1999

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API