United States v. Wilson
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KANE, Judge:
Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of carnal knowledge in violation *557of Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. In accordance with a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved so much of the sentence as provides for a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to the grade of Private El, and confinement for three years with suspension of confinement in excess of nine months for a period of nine months with provision for automatic remission.
In accordance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McClaughry v. DemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. RyanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. SaundersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. MoraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. AllgoodU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. ChoyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992