Legal Opinion

United States v. Mora

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 16, 1988No. 55,540; CM 447894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COX, Judge:

This case started out as a simple guilty plea with a pretrial agreement and the military judge sitting as a general court-martial. Pleas were regularly tendered and accepted.1 During the sentencing portion of the trial, however, things began to unravel. First, trial counsel introduced a document — without defense objection — containing information that should not have been before the court.2 Fortunately, the military judge detected the items and announced that he would disregard them. Worse, defense counsel himself, apparently through carelessness, introduced…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SherrodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. Burtt v. SchickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. DurrU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. MoraU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. WilsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. DosseyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  4. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. United States v. BlackettUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API