Liesener v. Weslo, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMALKIN, District Judge.
I
This tragic case of a paralyzing backyard trampoline injury is before the Court on both defendants' motions for summary judgment, as well as defendant Weslo’s motion for partial summary judgment. No oral hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105, D.Md.
The case involves a circular trampoline manufactured and distributed by defendant Weslo and sold at retail by defendant WalMart Stores (d/b/a Sam’s Wholesale Club) to one James Huff in Atlanta, Georgia. Huff assembled the trampoline and placed it on the lawn of his home in Maryland in June of 1989. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Margaret Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Garrett v. Nissen CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shreve v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Heckman v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Richardson v. Phillip Morris Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Anderson v. Hedstrom Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Anderson v. Weslo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.