Legal Opinion

Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & Lothrop

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 16, 1957No. 13017PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Mrs. Marguerite Jamieson, bought from Woodward & Lothrop, a department store, an elastic exerciser manufactured by Helena Rubinstein, Inc., which she had seen advertised in a magazine. She bought by brand name, “Lithe-Line”, and no special instructions as to use were given her by the vendor’s salesperson. While she was using the exerciser she suffered a sudden unconsciousness, and although she testified she did not know what happened it appears to be a reasonable inference that the exerciser slipped and struck her in the eye. She sued Woodward & Lothrop for…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  5. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Pemberton v. American Distilled Spirits Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Moran v. Fabergé, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API