Legal Opinion

Garrett v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 16-90-05706; CA A69224PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff brought this declaratory judgment action, claiming that her attorneys are entitled to a share of a personal injury protection (PIP) reimbursement for attorney fees, expenses and costs incurred in recovering a $25,000 settlement. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the trial court granted plaintiffs motion. ORCP 47. Defendant appeals, and we reverse.

After plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident, defendant, plaintiffs motor vehicle liability insurer, paid her $10,580.23 in personal injury protection benefits. Defendant notified plaintiff that it would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weidert v. State Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Edwards v. Bonneville Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Allstate Insurance v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larsen Oil Co. v. Federated Service InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
  2. Matter of Estate of KokjohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. Monson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Colony Insurance Co. v. Victory Construction LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  5. Schutt v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API