Legal Opinion
In Re Steven Kramer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2002No. 01-55115PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether a federal district in California may impose reciprocal discipline by disbarring an attorney on the basis of his disbarment from practice in New York.
I
In 1998, Steven Kramer was disbarred from practice in the State of New York. The misconduct that gave rise to his disbarment is described in In re Kramer (“Kramer I”), 235 A.D.2d 87, 664 N.Y.S.2d 1 (App.Div.1997), where the First Department of New York’s Appellate Division found Kramer guilty of professional misconduct based on his misdeeds in two separate cases: one in New York, in which a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re: Robert B. SurrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Gadda v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re: Williams v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- In Re RomanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- In Re CorrinetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.