Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Textile MacHine Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 14, 1954No. 11204_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this court to enforce an order issued by it against the respondent, Textile Machine Works, Inc. The jurisdiction of this court is based upon Section 10(e) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq. The principal question of law which we must decide is the effect of that proviso of Section 10(b) of the Act, which requires unfair labor practice charges to be filed and served no later than six months after the alleged unfair labor practice occurs. 1 A similar question was involved in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennwoven, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Kingston Cake Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Elijah KING, Appellant, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Doris R. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Inda v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Tudyman v. United AirlinesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Newsom v. Textron AerostructuresCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.